 |
| Tejashwi Yadav holds voter list proof amid Bihar voter ID controversy and ECI investigation 2025. |
Background of the Controversy
The ECI's scrutiny began when Tejashwi Yadav alleged that his name had mysteriously vanished from Bihar’s voter list despite possessing a valid EPIC. During a press conference, he presented evidence showing that no records could be found under his name, suggesting a concerted effort to disenfranchise voters before the elections. His claims ignited speculation regarding potential electoral manipulation and raised alarm bells about voter rights in the state.
However, the ECI quickly countered these allegations by affirming that Yadav's name is indeed present in the draft electoral rolls, and they released documentation to substantiate their claims. The conflict intensified when reports emerged regarding two separate EPIC numbers attributed to him, with one being verified while the existence of the other remains dubious.
The Valid EPIC Number
According to ECI sources, Tejashwi Yadav has consistently used EPIC number RAB0456228 since at least 2015. This number was also utilized during his nomination process in 2020, indicating its validity within official records. Despite his public assertions to the contrary, officials have confirmed that this EPIC number is linked to his name in the current draft electoral rolls.
The Questionable EPIC Number
On the other hand, concerns arise around a second EPIC number—RAB2916120—which has been reported as non-existent after thorough investigations spanning over ten years of records. ECI sources suggest it is "highly likely" that this second card was not issued through legitimate channels. Further inquiries are ongoing to determine whether it constitutes a forged document.
The gravity of this situation cannot be understated. If proven true, such discrepancies could undermine public trust in electoral processes and raise significant legal implications for Yadav and his party.
Political Ramifications
Tejashwi Yadav's accusations not only challenge the credibility of the ECI but also cast a shadow over the electoral landscape as a whole. With assembly elections on the horizon, any doubts regarding voter registration can significantly influence public sentiment and election outcomes.
Moreover, Yadav's claims may serve as a double-edged sword; while they rally support among his constituents who feel disenfranchised, they also risk alienating undecided voters concerned about stability and governance amidst allegations against electoral institutions.
In an intriguing twist, during this period of turmoil, Yadav took aim at Chirag Paswan—a minister from a rival faction—labeling him a "weak minister" and "silent spectator." Such remarks indicate that amidst internal strife regarding voter eligibility, political leaders continue to engage in typical adversarial tactics to consolidate their positions ahead of critical elections.
Conclusion
As investigations continue into Tejashwi Yadav’s dual EPIC numbers and claims of disenfranchisement, one thing is clear: the stakes are high for both him and Bihar’s political climate as a whole. This controversy not only raises questions about individual eligibility but also highlights systemic vulnerabilities within India’s electoral framework.
For voters and observers alike, staying informed about these developments is crucial as they reflect larger themes concerning democracy and representation in contemporary politics. As Bihar gears up for its assembly elections, citizens must remain vigilant to ensure their voices are heard—not just through votes but also by holding leaders accountable for their actions amid such controversies.
#tejashwiyadav #biharpolitics #voteridscandal #votedeletion #eciprobe #electionfraud2025 #biharelections2025 #kingindianmedia
Tags
News